Thursday, September 17, 2009

Goldman Sachs - Boeing 2012!

I don't see how we're ever going to get this cat back into the bag.

I see a 2012 election between Goldman Sachs-Boeing and United Health Care-Archer Daniels Midland. Guns and money versus health insurance and corporate farming.

May the greediest and most corrupt win (as usual)!

P.S. If the above wasn't entirely clear, I blame the hour and the headache. What I'm saying is with representation like this, why not just give up the pretense that our Senators and such as do anything besides serve the corporations that purchased their souls.

Anyways, here's TIME magazine, seeking to improve my day!

If you get your information from liberal sources, the crowd numbered about 70,000, many of them greedy racists. If you get your information from conservative sources, the crowd was hundreds of thousands strong, perhaps as many as a million, and the tenor was peaceful and patriotic.

Take it away, Glennzilla


ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

From the Department of Big Surprises Department.

g said...

The editors must have snipped the third alternate, where official sources' crowd numbers are quoted (strangely, facts have a liberal bias).

Hey, thunder!! it was over 30 years ago, but I remember wandering around in the Short North and Victorian village while in college, looking at all those incredible red brick Richardsonian houses. Very nostalgic to be reminded of those days.

M. Bouffant said...

It is to laugh, almost, as I seem to have made inadvertent links to you & SubBub (& others) w/ my feeding bogroll [sic] yet yours doesn't do the same.

Who is doing it rongy-rong-rong?

And what the hell is it that's wrong?

ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

And what the hell is it that's wrong?

You're axing me? Heck, I consider you and S-MG my IT consultants. When I link to someone's post, it doesn't show up at all.

P.S. g, so you were an OSU grad? I moooved here from NY in 2006, meself.

herr doktor bimler said...

If you get your information from liberal sources... If you get your information from conservative sources...

So this person -- whose research extends as far as looking up the same contradicting websites that you have browsed already, but not to checking which is correct -- expects to be called a Journalist, and expects you to pay $$$ to buy the magazine containing this summary?